Sunday night I tweeted this:
Bill Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard, replied:
At any rate, the use of the terminology Judea and Samaria are prevalent throughout the entire history of printed books.
Here:
![]()
Here:
![]()
And hundreds of others.
Perhaps that terminology should be recognized as the "status quo" that must be respected? Or does the "status quo" only go in one direction - towards any time period, no matter how short, that Arabs tried to erase all traces of Jewish history from certain areas?
Who knew that 16th century Latin scholars were really using the language of right wing Jewish settlers? pic.twitter.com/42dUPrbYrW
— ElderOfZiyon (@elderofziyon) November 10, 2014Bill Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard, replied:
.@elderofziyon Jen Psaki @statedeptspox preparing a statement denouncing the author of De Epiphania Domini as a "chicken----."
— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) November 10, 2014At any rate, the use of the terminology Judea and Samaria are prevalent throughout the entire history of printed books.
Here:
And hundreds of others.
Perhaps that terminology should be recognized as the "status quo" that must be respected? Or does the "status quo" only go in one direction - towards any time period, no matter how short, that Arabs tried to erase all traces of Jewish history from certain areas?